rss Print this page

DWF Insurance Costs Update

Insight Contacts

Steven Dawson

Steven Dawson

Head of the Costs Department

DD +44 (0)113 261 6118

M +44 (0)7736 908 568

Add vCard View Biography

Nigel Teasdale

Nigel Teasdale

DD +44 (0)1772 554264

M +44 (0)7752 709 114

Add vCard View Biography

Scott Smeaton

Scott  Smeaton

DD +44 (0)161 603 1522

M +44 (0)7872 197 915

Add vCard View Biography

Date: 03/02/12

Since 30 April 2010, personal injury motor claims with a value of up to £10,000 have fallen under the RTA PI Scheme for low value motor claims with its prescribed fixed costs regime. For those cases which either pre-date or drop out of the RTA PI Scheme, the fallback provision is the fixed recoverable costs regime for low value RTA cases contained in Section II of CPR Part 45.

With costs tightly controlled under both of these schemes, it was perhaps inevitable that a battleground would emerge wherever claimants see the potential to obtain full costs.

Against the backdrop of ongoing government reform designed to curb the excesses of civil litigation, a number of recent decisions show that the courts are not prepared to allow any of the fixed costs regimes to be undermined.

In this guide, Nigel Teasdale, Scott Smeaton & Steven Dawson draw out the useful lessons for insurers from these decisions and highlight their wider significance should the government decide to expand the fixed costs regimes beyond motor claims.

Please click on the pdf icon below to read the guide in full.

Downloads
Costs Update February 2012 PDF Costs Update February 2012
 

Sectors

Client services

Our people

Insight

Join us

Who we are